Non-Western and Western Intentional Worlds Compared
- Title
- Non-Western and Western Intentional Worlds Compared
- Description
- Hunter-gatherers do not, as a rule, approach their environment as an external world of nature that has to be ‘grasped’ conceptually and appropriated symbolically within the terms of an imposed cultural design, as a precondition for effective action. They do not see themselves as mindful subjects having to contend with an alien world of physical objects; indeed the separation of mind and nature has no place in their thought and practice. I should add that they are not peculiar in this regard: my purpose is certainly not to argue for some distinctive hunter-gatherer worldview or to suggest that they are somehow ‘at one’ with their environments in a way that other peoples are not. Nor am I concerned to set up a comparison between the ‘intentional worlds’ of hunter-gatherers and Western scientists or humanists. It is of course an illusion to suppose that such a comparison could be made on level terms, since the primacy of Western ontology, the ‘givenness’ of nature and culture, is implicit in the very premises on which the comparative project is itself established.
- Designer
- Ingold, Tim
- Date
- 2000
- Bibliographic Citation
- Ingold, Tim. (2000). The perception of the environment: Essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. Routledge.
- is depiction of attribute
- Rectangle
- is composed of
- Circle
- use feature
- Brace
Part of Non-Western and Western Intentional Worlds Compared